3. Two Men, Two Cups, Two Coins Two fair coins are tossed and each is covered by one of two identical opaque cups. The cups sit side by side; nothing distinguishes them. You enter the room alone, lift one cup chosen at random, look, and set it back down exactly as you found it. You leave. Your friend then enters — with no way of knowing which cup you lifted — and does the same. You may have lifted the same cup or different ones. You saw Heads. Your friend tells you they saw Heads too. What is the probability that both coins are Heads? Added 22 August 2026 · Updated 22 August 2026 Show Solution Solution: 2/3rds. The easiest way to see why the answer is 2/3 is to imagine repeating the experiment many times. Suppose you do it 800 times. The two coins have four equally likely outcomes: HH, HT, TH, TT. So roughly: 200 times they're HH. 200 times they're HT. 200 times they're TH. 200 times they're TT. Now throw away every experiment where you and your friend didn't both see Heads. When the coins are HH, both cups contain Heads. So every one of those 200 experiments survives. You both necessarily see Heads. When the coins are HT, there's only one Heads cup. You need to pick that cup, which happens half the time. Then your friend also needs to independently pick that same cup, which happens half the time. So both see Heads only: 1/2 × 1/2 = 1/4 of the time. Of the 200 HT experiments, only 50 survive. Exactly the same thing happens with TH. Of those 200 experiments, 50 survive. TT can never produce two observations of Heads, so 0 survive. So after learning that you both saw Heads, the possibilities remaining are: HH: 200 cases HT: 50 cases TH: 50 cases That's 300 possible cases, and 200 of them have both coins Heads. So: 200 / 300 = 2/3. The unintuitive part is that seeing Heads twice doesn't mean you've probably seen two different coins. If there's only one Heads coin, you both have to randomly choose that exact same cup. That's relatively unlikely. If both coins are Heads, however, seeing Heads twice is guaranteed. That's why your two observations provide evidence in favor of HH, raising its probability from the original 1/4 to 2/3.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!
Add a Comment or Suggest an Answer